|
Information/Action
taking place at June 13, 2006, Board of Education meeting
BOND PROJECTS
INFORMATION GIVEN
Bond
Projects Manger Keith Maready provided the Board with information and
items for consideration.
Receive
Bond Project Update
Mr.
Maready said bond projects scheduling is complete and cash flow charts
have been developed in correlation with the schedules.
Consider
Accepting Cash Flow Chart
Mr. Maready recommended the Board approve a cash flow chart as submitted
and request the County Commissioners to amend the project ordinance
accordingly.
Dr.
Rick Luettich made the motion to approve the Cash Flow Chart as the
school system’s planning document. Al Hill provided the second.
Dr. Lenker noted the chart outlines the expenditures for the $50 million
bond referendum and includes every project voters approved in the bond
referendum.
Dr. Luettich said his emphasis would continue to be on “sealing the
envelope” projects. Dr. Luettich asked what size auditorium was
included in the document planning.
Mr. Maready said the document included a 400-seat auditorium at Croatan
High School.
Dr. Lenker said the request was to accept the chart as a guideline. He
said the County Manager requested an overall chart to be used for
planning, and would like to present that document to the County
Commissioners next week.
Dr. Luettich said he could not support a 400-seat auditorium at Croatan
High School. He called the chart a schedule and stressed it was more of
a cash flow chart then an endorsement of specific design details.
Mr. Carr said the document was not an endorsement of a 400-seat
auditorium but an endorsement of a calendar of how the bond budget would
be spent. He requested the Board of Education be provided a chart
reorganized by site.
Mr. Hill said he hoped the bids would come in under budget and that
money could be used for the auditorium.
Chair Neagle said this was a workable plan with the exception of the
auditorium at Croatan High School.
After discussion, the motion passed 6-0.
Consider
Award of Construction Contracts:
Broad
Creek Middle School HVAC – Mr. Maready noted this work would convert
the existing heat pumps to a closed loop system, which would eliminate
ground water source cooling. He noted the bond budget for this work was
$93,356 and he presented a contract from Diversified Construction
Services for $54,825 with a $3,000 contingency for total of $57,825. He
recommended the board award the bid and request the County Commissioners
to amend the project ordinance.
Dr. Rick Luettich made the motion to approve this contract with
Diversified Construction Services in the amount of $57,825. Al Hill
provided the second and the motion passed unanimously.
West
Carteret High School Resurface Track/Tennis Courts – The bond budget
for the resurfacing of the track and the tennis courts is $140,981. Mr.
Maready presented a contract from Advantage Sports Surfaces, Inc., in
the amount of $84,850, with includes a $4,000 contingency. He
recommended the board award the bid and request the County Commissioners
to amend the project ordinance.
Mike Hodges made the motion to accept the contract with Advantage Sports
Surfaces, Inc., in the amount of $84,850.
Al
Hill provided the second.
Dr.
Luettich questioned why this work was going to be done at this time
because it did not address sealing the envelope or ventilation issues.
Several Board members noted the safety concerns for students the track
and tennis courts were causing.
Mr. Maready said many of the “seal the envelope” projects will take
more study time. This work can be done this summer and be ready for
students at the beginning of school.
Bill Blair said he was pleased the work could be done over the summer
and under budget.
After discussion, the motion passed 6-0.
East
Carteret High Parking Lot/Service Road Paving – The construction cost
budget for parking lot and service road paving and striping is $200,823.
Mr. Maready presented a bid for $137,953 from Onslow Grading &
Paving. Because of unknown soil conditions, he recommended the Board
establish an allowance for remediation of unsuitable soils in the amount
of $13,050. The contingency for the project is $5,000, for a total
contract of $156,748. Mr. Maready noted he hoped to use some of the
savings to improve lighting in the parking lot. He recommended the board
award the bid and request the County Commissioners to amend the project
ordinance.
Dr. Luettich was concerned about spending money at East Carteret on
something he would prioritize at a lower level then an adequate HVAC
system or new windows. Dr. Luettich would like to see the paving work
done and expects to see it done, but said he wanted the security of
knowing the highest priority items, like a complete HVAC system, could
be completed first.
Bill Blair noted the students at East Carteret High School had never had
a paved parking lot and if the Board waits the prices will go up. He
said the parking lot was a very important item and a safety concern.
Mr. Hodges agreed with Dr. Luettich and said while the parking lot was a
high priority, the Board should error on the side of caution and get the
school building envelope sealed and get the ventilation under control.
Mr. Carr agreed and asked Mr. Maready to expedite the bidding process on
the HVAC and windows for East Carteret High School so the parking lot
paving could be considered again.
Bill Blair made the motion to approve a contract with Onslow Grading
& Paving in the amount of $156,748. Cathy Neagle provided the
second. The motion failed 2-4 with Mr. Blair and Mrs. Neagle voting in
favor of the motion.
Mr. Maready said the bid date for the HVAC package at East Carteret High
School is October 2, 2008.
Dr. Luettich said more information was needed for the other parts of the
planned renovations at East Carteret High School was needed before he
could take action.
Mr. Hodges stated the Board intends to pave the parking lot at East
Carteret High School. He wanted the public to know the vote on the
matter failed because members wanted to make sure the top priorities at
East Carteret High School were completed first.
Chair Neagle said the issue was tabled at this time.
Consider
Changes to Architect/Engineer Contracts:
Roofing
Engineer, Inc. (REI) – Mr. Maready noted that revisions to contracts
from Roofing Engineer, Inc., have been received. He and Attorney Neil
Whitford have reviewed the revisions. These revisions add to the scope
of work being performed by REI. The additional work is roof renovation
design at locations that were previously under the direction of the
architectural team. Mr. Maready recommended contracts be approved as
submitted for East Carteret High School, White Oak Elementary School and
Newport Elementary School.
East Carteret High School –
Dr.
Luettich asked what company would do the soffit work at East Carteret
High School.
Mr.
Maready said soffit work was not addressed in the bond referendum. He
hopes the bids would come in such a way to have funding to address some
facia and soffit repairs at East Carteret High School. He noted the most
cost efficient time to do facia and soffit work would be when the roof
work was done.
Dr.
Luettich asked Mr. Maready to find out how much it would cost to include
the soffit design in the contract and provide that to the Board.
Mike Hodges made the motion to table the REI contract for East Carteret
High School roofing until the next Board meeting.
David Carr provided the second and all members voted aye.
White
Oak Elementary School –
Dr.
Luettich made the motion to accept the REI contract for White Oak
Elementary School. Al Hill provided the second and the motion passed
6-0.
Newport
Elementary School –
Dr.
Luettich expressed concern that the proposed contract did not include
soffit or fascia replacement.
Mr.
Maready said the soffits and fascia did not need to be replaced at the
school at this time for function reasons.
Dr.
Luettich made the motion to approve the contract with REI for Newport
Elementary School.
All
Hill provided the second and the motion passed 6-0.
Stanford
White Associates – Revisions to contracts with Stanford White
Associates have been received and reviewed. The revision adds to the
scope of work being performed by the company. The additional work is
HVAC renovation design at locations that were previously under the
direction of the architectural team.
Dr. Luettich reviewed and asked for further information on several
project items.
Mr. Hodges made the motion to table the contracts with Stanford White
Associates.
Al Hill provided the second and all members voted aye.
Shuller
Ferris Lindstrom & Associates (SFL+a) – Revisions to contracts
with SFL+a have been reviewed. The revision removes renovation design
from the company’s scope of work and reduces the company’s fee
agreement.
Attorney Neil Whitford presented the contracts.
He noted for cost-cutting measures complimenting the Board’s efforts
to complete the school bond projects on budget, Dr. Lenker has been
negotiating with SFL+a Architects for a reduction in the scope of their
work and a corresponding reduction of their architectural fees. The bond
projects include both extensive renovation and new construction. The
plan to reduce costs is for the school system to directly handle as much
of the renovation work as possible, and to use consulting engineers when
design professionals are required, but to remove the renovations from
the architects’ work responsibility. The architects will remain
responsible for design and construction administration for the new
construction. Because the architects will only be involved with new
construction, they have agreed to reduce their fees to essentially 6.5
percent of construction costs, down from 7.5 percent. The architects
have also agreed to eliminate travel reimbursement for school system
projects and to assign a new project architect to handle the day-to-day
work on the projects.
Attorney Whitford noted the reduction in estimated architect’s fees is
$1,206,512. These figures are estimates, which is based on 6.5 percent
of the estimated construction costs. If the costs exceed the estimates,
the architect’s fees will rise accordingly. Attorney Whitford also
noted that the reduction in architect’s fees was not a net savings to
the school system because some of the work that originally fell under
the architects’ purview has been shifted to engineering firms. The
preliminary additional engineering fees are about $720,000. He noted
that nonetheless, the school system would realize significant savings
under this arrangement.
Dr. Rick Luettich made motion to approve the revised contacts with SFL+a
as presented.
Bill Blair provided the second. The vote passed 5-0 with 1 abstention.
Mr. Hodges said he was not opposed to the contract but had not received
the contract in time to completely review and support it. Attorney
Whitford said the late date of delivery was because the negotiations
were just completed.
|